I'll tell you, that backlog number tracks. In terms of our side, between February and May calls we executed master supply agreements with two major hyperscalers — Julian disclosed it on the May call. One qualification started with twenty-six vendors and we finished first. If I can brag, that's the only brag that matters. These only mean we're qualified to bid on expected near-term data-center projects. The initial order is an expectation for Q3, not booked. The annual report mentions data centers only as a demand driver, the quarterly has zero detail. I wouldn't read too much into the timing.
Here's what we do: we don't make battery cells, we integrate full grid-scale storage systems and run them - hardware, our own control software, and years of service on top. Since February we signed master supply agreements with two major hyperscalers, and one of those processes started with 26 vendors before we finished every qualification. Now the harder half. Fiscal 2025 revenue fell 16% and we swung to a $68 million loss on tax-credit delays. Most cells still come from Chinese makers like CATL and BYD, so our whole domestic-content edge leans on one plant in Smyrna, Tennessee that just changed hands. And AES, our founding shareholder, is still a big related-party customer - about 24% last year - though that tail is coming down fast. Both halves are real.
I'll tell you, fiscal 2025 revenue fell 16.2% to about $2.26 billion, gross margin was roughly 13%, adjusted EBITDA dropped about 75% to $19.5 million, and we swung to a $68.0 million net loss from a $30.4 million profit the year before. In terms of the backdrop, management tied the decline to tax‑credit uncertainty, legislative changes that delayed contracting, an Arizona facility ramp delay, and lower volumes. I wouldn't read too much into it.
I'll tell you, fiscal twenty twenty five revenue fell sixteen point two percent to about two point two six billion. In terms of margin, gross came in roughly thirteen percent, adjusted EBITDA dropped about seventy five percent to nineteen point five million, and we swung to a sixty eight million net loss from thirty point four million profit. Tax-credit uncertainty, legislative changes delayed contracting, Arizona ramp delay, lower volumes. Remaining performance obligations five point three billion, thirteen percent AES. I wouldn't read too much into it.
I'll tell you, between our February and May 2026 earnings calls we executed master supply agreements with two major hyperscalers, as disclosed by CEO Julian Nebreda on the May call. In terms of the process, one started with 26 vendors and we were the first to finish all qualifications. If I can brag, that's the only brag that matters. These agreements only position us as a qualified supplier to bid on expected near‑term data‑center projects, and the initial order is an expectation, not a booked result. I wouldn't read too much into the timing.
I'll tell you, we signed master supply agreements with two major hyperscalers between the February and May calls — Julian said it on the May call. In terms of the qualification, one process started with twenty-six vendors and we finished first. If you tell the truth, that's the only brag that matters. These agreements only mean we're qualified to bid on expected near-term data center projects. The initial order from one is an expectation for Q3, not booked. The annual report mentions data centers only as a demand driver, the quarterly has zero detail. I wouldn't read too much into the timing.
I'll tell you, between February and May calls we signed master supply agreements with two major hyperscalers. In terms of the process, one started with twenty-six vendors and we were the first to finish every qualification. These only position us to bid on expected near-term data center projects — the initial order from one is an expectation for the third quarter, not a booked result. The filings carry zero data center detail; the substance lives only in the call. I wouldn't read too much into the timing.
I'll tell you, we feel that in our backlog. In terms of components, we treat them as commodities and integrate. Fiscal 2025 revenue fell 16.2% to about $2.26 billion, gross margin roughly 13%, adjusted EBITDA dropped about 75% to $19.5 million, swung to a $68 million net loss from $30.4 million profit. Tax-credit uncertainty, legislative changes delayed contracting, Arizona ramp delay, lower volumes. Remaining performance obligations $5.3 billion, 13% AES. I wouldn't read too much into the quarter — the backlog is the backlog.
I'll tell you, that Smyrna plant changed hands March 31 — AESC sold majority to Fixx Energy, Longroad's subsidiary. We signed a new supply deal for the next few years, cells still qualify under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In terms of the broader chain, it still runs through China: CATL, BYD, LG, Samsung is the baseline. The domestic-content edge is real but conditional — prohibited-foreign-entity rules not final until December, filing flags it as a risk that can delay contracts. On CATL and BYD going vertical? Hasn't meaningfully changed market intensity.