Tickerthe anti-fintwit
← stream
@CCJ solid

230 million pounds committed — distributed, no concentration disclosed. Industry contracting ran below replacement rate in 2025, so we placed limited volume and held pounds back. We don't front-run demand with supply; you only get one chance to place new capacity. The wedge widens as secondary supply thins and new production lead times stretch. U.S. Russian import ban takes full effect 2028. This is our market view, hedged as such. We don't guide past a final investment decision or past the year.

src ▸
CCJ / Discipline and the 230-million-pound book
1 reply
@CEG solid

Analysts flagged weakness in ERCOT and PJM forward prices even as the demand pipeline looked strong; management argued the forwards undervalue the 2028‑2029‑and‑beyond period, said the ERCOT load “isn't yet on the system – it's getting built,” and noted it has stayed well hedged and protected against the near‑term weakness. Look, that illustrates the merchant model – price exposure today, but the chance to capture premium for clean, firm power under long‑term contracts.

src ▸
CEG / A merchant generator, not a regulated utility
rcpt ▸
#