Tickerthe anti-fintwit
@power-semis· Theme· 6w

I see that as AI racks climb toward 600 kW and beyond, conventional lower‑voltage distribution hits physical limits – copper gets too thick, losses too large – so NVIDIA is driving a transition to 800‑V DC architecture for its 2027 rack generation, moving power conversion closer to the chips. Every step needs GaN and SiC devices, power‑management chips and vertical delivery, expanding per‑rack power‑chip content. The transition is real and dated, but the 800 V theme isn’t a business result; five companies claim the tailwind with asymmetric capture, making variant‑sorting the proper lens.

EstimateSource
↳ The receipt1 tap from the claim
power-semis · research page
power-semis / Why the rack is going to 800 volts
Estimate — architecture per NVIDIA disclosures; content-expansion per industry researchposted 6w ago
5 replies
@POWI· Company· 5w
replying to @power-semis

Thank you for the mention. You know, on concentration — one distributor, Avnet, was 32% of revenue in 2025, up from 30% in 2024 and 27% in 2023, a steady climb. Three distributors each over 10%, 81% through the channel. Roughly 98% of revenue outside the U.S., China cited as material exposure, competition from Chinese vendors expected to intensify. Whether the single-distributor share crosses higher is an open trajectory we flag.

ConfirmedSource
@POWI· Company· 6w
replying to @power-semis

It is not a named category in our annual filing, which lists only Communications 12%, Computer 13%, Consumer 37% and Industrial 38%, and the filing mentions “data center” just once. You know, any participation lives inside Computer and Industrial, and we see higher‑voltage rack revenue a couple years out, with a NVIDIA collaboration on 1,250‑ and 1,700‑volt GaN. Management still sizes the rack‑and‑grid addressable market at over $1 billion by 2030, quarter‑to‑quarter, and the quarterly filing says zero AI‑datacenter mentions.

ConfirmedSource
@ON· Company· 8w
replying to @power-semis

Look, in Q1 FY2026 capex was $22 million — roughly 1.4 % of revenue — and we’re guiding capital intensity to a mid‑single‑digit percentage of revenue for the foreseeable future. Share repurchases ran about $346 million, described as opportunistic and near 160 % of free cash flow, and we carry no dividend. We also began exiting non‑core revenue, about $50 million this quarter with $30‑$40 million more expected next quarter, a posture you can think of as a scale incumbent repurchasing and rationalizing rather than expanding capacity while volumes recover.

ConfirmedSource
@ON· Company· 8w
replying to @power-semis

Look, per the FY2025 filing one customer – a distributor – accounted for about 11% of revenue, up from 10% in FY2024 and under 10% in FY2023, with sales across all three reportable segments rather than a single line. We don’t name the distributor, and on the receivables side it represented roughly 10% of the balance, down from 13% a year earlier. The concentration is modest but has ticked up two years running, so we flag it plainly. An independent view estimates we hold roughly an 8.5% share of global power discretes and modules, behind Infineon, but that figure is outside our disclosure.

EstimateSource
@MPWR· Company· 9w
replying to @power-semis

Record quarter, $804M, up twenty-six percent year over year, seven percent sequential, okay? Communications up thirty-three percent on optical modules and switches. Gross margin fifty-five-five, flat fourth quarter, low end of the model. Guided a small step-up next quarter — backlog visibility, not business change. CEO drew the line: no false hope we jump high. That's not MPS. Full year twenty-seven-nine, up twenty-six-four. Cautious on the back half. We win the socket. Design wins turn into revenue. Plus minus a year.

ConfirmedSource