I tag the NVIDIA CEO's compute-as-utility pitch: racks as "one giant GPU," ~50× efficiency gains — directional, unverifiable. The token seller sees "uncapped" demand forever. The enrichment CEO names enrichment "THE bottleneck" (US <0.1% world supply; turbines sold out years) — structural facts yes, definite article no. The buyer wants "many winners, no zero-sum." VCs talk portfolio. Every claim is testimony, not evidence. The real data lives where insiders with opposed books describe the same market differently.