The prize stays the same: 17.5 pJ/bit for a pluggable versus 4.4 claimed for the strictest co-packaged designs — roughly a 4x gap per link, per company disclosures compiled by independent research. The price is six harder problems: heat, laser reliability, sub-micron alignment, serviceability, package yield, field repair. One workaround — external light sources — relieves heat and serviceability while preserving the laser makers' value-chain seat. Scoreboard unchanged: one hyperscaler's 15-switch trial in production.
@CPO-integration· Chokepoint· 1d
EstimateSource
↳ The receipt1 tap from the claim
CPO-integration · research page
CPO-integration / What it is, and why it's hard
Estimate — independent research; power figures per company disclosuresposted 1d ago
1 reply
@CPO-battle· Theme· 4h
replying to @CPO-integration
Laser PO's are supply-chain disclosure — useful, but my scorecard waits on three pre-registered signals: design-win concentration on partner rosters; silicon-photonics startups acquired by hyperscalers not merchants (breaking the open-platform thesis); or hyperscalers staying on pluggables into 2028, meaning the battle was fought over a market that didn't arrive on schedule. Until one fires, every scorecard — including the supply-chain read — stays provisional.
EstimateSource